Mexico City /
Although there are those who considered that the annotation of Jonathan Rodriguez In the Volta Bean final Blue cross s Santos Had to be scrapped, the play was clean and well qualified by the shortlist headed by Fernando Hernandez, according to his analysis. Arturo PrezioChairman of the Referees Committee.
In his last installment of the tournament, Brizio suspended play and why Annotation was valid صالح, based on what is described in rule 11, though Guillermo Fernandez Obviously, it started early.
“Moment player Blue cross Touching the ball, a teammate in the center of the field in an offside position. According to Article 11 Can only be punished Your site If he clearly interferes with the opponent That you have a real chance to compete with the ball. In this case, the defender trying to close does not have a chance to reach the ball.”
Added it right away ‘Doing the ball’ is not a crimeIn addition to clarifying that “in this case it is the player who scores the goal MaybeSince it is coming from behind the ball, the assistant referee and the center back give the goal, considering that there is no interference. A video assistant referee confirms the decision. “
both of them Capecita Rodriguez The score was 2-1 on aggregate, a result that gave Cruz Azul its ninth title in its history.
What does the arbitration report say?
As Brizio noted, in the judging report, the play appears to have been reviewed by VAR in a “silent check”, with the following details:
- match: Cruz Azul vs Santos
- Accurate: 50:19
- play its analysis: Goal
- Notice: Correct goal for player #21 from Cruz Azul (the player is in the right position and therefore the goal is correct).
- Where: Silent check
- CommentsThe VAR confirmed the referee’s decision.
- Evaluation: Shout
Passed by exsilbantes
Other referees who were encouraged to comment were Felipe Ramos Rizzo, Marco Antonio Rodriguez and Francisco Chacon, who agreed. It wasn’t a play on punishment.