We tend to understand that art and science are two opposing concepts, but that is only because of the excruciating inability of our educational and academic system to break boundaries and stimulate interdisciplinary projects. In the fuzzy semantic regions of our cerebral cortex, art is the realm of creativity, science is the realm of precision. Silly things. At the dawn of Quattrocento, artist, architect and scientist Filippo Brunelleschi discovered the laws of perspective that not only possess mathematical precision, but have also been hailed by Nobel Prize winners such as Frank Wilczek as a paragon of elegance, the pinnacle of scientific thought. It consists in finding a brief and understandable description of a large number of phenomena that have not been relevant until now.
Looking at the same problem from the opposite perspective, physicists often consider Einstein’s general relativity a work of art. The theory says – in an insurmountable situation Equation Linguistics physicist John Archibald Wheeler – This substance tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move. It is the theory of gravity that bypasses Newton’s theory by many decimals in predicting what is happening in the universe – time and space expanding or contracting, spreading gravitational waves and forming black holes – and constituting one of the major milestones for historians. But it is also a work of art, more imaginative than observational, and with a self-consistency similar to that of a great novel or perfect painting. Relativity is Girls From science.
Music has had an intimate relationship with science since prehistoric times for both fields. Some cuneiform tablets show that Mesopotamians already knew what we now call the Pythagorean scale (re mi fa sol la si do … and start over). This scale is the universal basis for all music, and is obtained through algorithms derogatory to simplicity, such as dividing the chord into two-thirds of its length and repeating it seven times (for musicians: it should start with the letter F). The experiment of Pythagoras, or the forgotten Ibn Mesopotamia who did it, shows that our aesthetic experience is based on mathematics.
Relativity is the “Mininas” of science
The result was so astounding that Pythagoras and his sect transgressed boundaries and invented a religion, in case more was needed, known as the Harmony of Spheres, which attempted to apply these simple numerical relationships to the solar system. That was a disaster. The truth is, yes there are simple numerical principles governing the solar system, such as Kepler’s laws, but Pythagoras could not have discovered them in his time, even less than his belief that the Earth was the center of the universe.
Domain harmony is not a pretty theory, among other things because it is wrong. The beauty of our solar system lies in the laws of Kepler and their interpretation by Newton. It’s an aesthetic that cannot be appreciated with the naked eye, but with high school math. Let the artists come back.